RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00566
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation Unsatisfactory Performance be changed to "Released from Active Duty."
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
More than six years have passed since his discharge from the Air Force. He has excelled in civilian life and would like to pursue a career in federal service/law enforcement. The narrative reason he received has made it difficult to obtain employment.
In support of his request, applicant submits copies of his DD Form 214 and his AF Form 100, Request an Authorization for Separation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 4 June 1997, the applicant was commissioned in the Regular Air Force.
On 23 April 2001, he received a referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) stating he lacked the basic maturity, judgement and decisiveness to follow orders. On 19 November 2001, he received another referral OPR stating he did not demonstrate the qualities of an Air Force officer. Effective 10 October 2002, he was discharged for unsatisfactory performance with an honorable discharge in the grade of second lieutenant.
On 19 October 2004, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request for upgrade of his discharge stating his discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
He served 5 years, 9 months and 10 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states on 14 June 2002, the Show Cause Authority (SCA) initiated discharge action against the applicant under AFI 36-3206, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, for failure to show acceptable qualities of leadership required of an officer in his grade and a record of marginal service over an extended period of time as shown by his OPRs covering two or more jobs and prepared by at least two different supervisors. On 14 June 2002, he acknowledged receipt and submitted a voluntary resignation instead of undergoing further administrative discharge proceedings. On 31 July 2002, AFMC/CV recommended he receive an honorable discharge. The discharge was reviewed by AF/JA prior to being forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Counsel (SAFPC). SAFPC directed he be discharged for unsatisfactory performance with an honorable service characterization. He has not presented any evidence of an error or injustice during the processing of his discharge.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 2 July 2009 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant changing his narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with the application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2009-00566 in Executive Session on 13 August 2009, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 February 2009, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 23 June 2009.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 July 2009.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02923
DPSD states the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time of the applicants separation. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 25 Mar 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2008-01257
He was represented by counsel before the BOI and the Air Force Discharge Review Board; however, the evidence submitted by the applicant and counsel did not convince either board that the applicant did not engage in serious and reoccurring misconduct which led to his discharge. The BOI members found the preponderance of the government’s evidence to be credible and sufficient to support the findings of wrongdoing and a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Nevertheless, since we...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02620
He was discharged with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation for Personality Disorder and issued a separation code of JFX and an RE code of 2C on 25 Sep 02. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02143
On 31 Aug 11, he retired in the grade of lieutenant colonel, having served in the grade of colonel for two years and eight months as a full colonel. The applicant contends that an OPR for the period 16 Jan 97 thru 26 Jun 97 should have been accomplished and were it not for its omission from is officer selection record (OSR), he would have been promoted BPZ. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03006
The HQ AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/JA recommends the applicant’s nonselection for retention by the 6 June 2006 FSB be set aside and that she be considered by a special FSB selection board utilizing a corrected RRF. However, the majority of the Board believes that thorough and fitting relief in this case would be to correct her records to show that she was selected for retention by the 10 Apr 06 FSB, and to reinstate her to active duty. Accordingly, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 01076
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code 2X, first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a 1J, Eligible to reenlist but elects separation to allow him...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00857 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received a referral report and referral letter by entering into the first unsatisfactory period of the weight management program (WMP). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C-Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without service characterization be changed to allow him to enlist in the National Guard. The HQ AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4K, which denotes medically disqualified or pending medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB) be changed to a RE code that will allow her to reenlist without a waiver. On 27 March 2002, the applicant...